Home

STRONG MEN DON’T BEAT or ABUSE WOMEN

July 31st, 2008

If ever a meeting place deserves its name and its clients it is The Pan Afric Hotel in Nairobi. It was recently the venue for a very important Pan African conference organised by the Pan African NGO, ACCORD, ably anchored by Awino Oketch and co-sponsored by other partners: The Pan African Conference on Ending Impunity for Sexual and Gender Based Violence (SGBV). All the key people including our indefatigable Mama, President of the Pan African Parliament, veteran gender and Women’s rights activist, Mrs. Gertrude Mongela ; Muthoni Wanyeki , head of the Kenya human rights commission, and many battle hardened sisters and younger activists, in the national and pan African women’s movement, members of parliament, regional multilateral organizations and CSOs were present. It was not just the sisters who were there. There were those Mrs. Mongela called ‘enlightened men’ including my controversialist brother, Prof Makau Mutua: cantankerous brothers like Brian Kagoro were there too.

The issue of gender based violence against women deserves the attention of all of us. It is widely decried yet it persists in spite of many national, regional, Pan African and international laws, conventions and protocols. Many governments are either unwilling or unable to enforce them and stop the systematic violence meted out against women everyday. There are many sources of this violence; structural, economic, social, religious, cultural, and the plainly gratuitous raw power inflicted simply because the perpetrator can do it, with impunity.

The conference reviewed the numerous laws and protocols that exist and examined why they are not being implemented. To end the impunity the conference identified a 6-point strategy: “ending impunity through accountability and implementation; centering on women survivors of SGBV; mobilizing popular support; securing adequate human and material resources; building bridges across sectors and within movements; and developing a new cadre of leadership”.

One of the key challenges about continental and sub regional protocols like the Women’s protocol of the AU is that countries ratify them at the Pan African level but do not domesticate them within the national laws thereby denying the justiciability of the protocol at the national level. But that is only partly true because in many countries even national laws are not being enforced. It is one thing to have good laws it is another for people to be aware of them, use them and enforce them. It is not just about the legal position but also the socio-economic, cultural and political environment whether they enhance and empower victims to come forward or discourage them. Is the society more tolerant of abusers than being sympathetic to, or defending, the victims?

Take the controversy in Uganda a few years ago. The Vice President of the country then, Dr Specioza Wandira Kazibwe, revealed to the public that she had been a victim of domestic violence. Her husband was not an illiterate but an Engineer. In spite of her powerful position the husband never saw beyond ‘this is my wife’ someone he ‘paid cow on’. Some of the negative reaction she got was not just from men but other women who accused her of embarrassing her family. Sections of the clergy even suggested she should have spoken to her priest! That experience showed that even economic and political power does not fully liberate a woman because the domination and oppression is anchored on cultural and religious manipulation and attitudes of society. Why should marriage so infantilise a woman that she could be beaten like a child and treated like a slave? The children Rights Convention does not even allow corporal punishment of Children and bars other forms of physical and emotional torture. So, where do Men derive the legitimacy of the whiplash, jackboot, their fists, and sometimes Panga, and other lethal weapons deployed against women, from?

Rape is probably the worst of all the violence that women suffer. It is not just in war times that women are raped but in so called ‘peace’ times. Can we imagine the millions of rapes in marriage/ other relationships that are being perpetrated every day which we never speak about? How many Africans will countenance the legal case for rape in marriage? How can you rape your own wife, many men and even some women will wonder?

There are too many ambiguities in our attitudes towards sexual and gender based violence. The personal is indeed political therefore combating it begins with us as individuals. No matter how comprehensive the laws are human beings, men and women, must be willing to change their attitudes and adopt Zero tolerance towards any abuse, violence, disrespect, demeaning behavior and denial of human rights to women. No culture or traditional values or religious misrepresentations should be used to justify treating women as second-class citizens.

While it is important for women to have autonomous spaces to discuss these issues and strategise on how to surmount them, it is also of crucial importance to create more shared spaces where these issues are discussed with the real and potential perpetrators of the violence: Men. The discussion needs to extend beyond the politically correct men who are very small in number and needs to be constantly challenged to practice what they preach and engage other brothers.

A strong man does not need to beat/abuse/intimidate his mother, spouse / partner, sister, daughter, niece, friend, colleague, house girl, secretary or any woman, to prove his strength.

“Forward ever , backward never”…..Kwame Nkrumah (1909 - 1972)

………………DON’T AGONISE! ORGANISE!!………………………………

Comments posted on this site are the sole opinions of respondents, and are not reflective of the views of Justice Africa.

One Response to “STRONG MEN DON’T BEAT or ABUSE WOMEN”

  1. James Sibanda Says:

    Dr Tajudeen

    There are many who question whether Dr Tajudeen is a real Pan-Afrikanist or not, but after reading your article on Mbeki entitled “One Man, No Matter How Bright, Does Not a Forest Make” I now understand why your values as a true Pan-Afrikanist are questionable. As the Western World reads an article like yours, they are relieved and pleased that Afrika is still full of people that they can use to continue confusing and dividing Afrikans in order to to continue controlling Afrikan resources. Your article confirms the Western belief that “If you want to do dirt work on Afrikans, send a Molato”, because indeed you seem to be doing real damage, much to their amusement.

    Your mention of Nobel Prize in the article also reminds me of the strategies used by the Western World that appeal to those who are inclined to be used to divide the Afrikans: They are appeased with prizes lsuch as the Nobel Prizes, Africa Laurette Prizes similar to the one given to Chissano, or walking Afrikan leaders on red carpets of Buckingham Palace or faking honour for African leaders by appointing them into orgnaisations as they did to Kofi Annan, etc. after which they perform with astonishing efficiency against their fellow Afrikans as pay back or to demonstrate that they understand western Values.

    And there you are: Through your article, you precisely aid the malign machinations of the Western World against the helpless Afrikan society in your persuit of recognition by them, and perhaps become a candidate for a Nobel Prize as well. Other Afr

    Don’t you think that you should spend more energy fighting for the just cause for Afrikans of Reparation for the gross inhuman injustice that Afrikans suffered at the hands of the Western World whose wealth was created by Afrikan Sweat and Blood, Dr Tajudeen? Would this not be better effort spent rather than be seen making inappropriate and derogative comments about Afrikan intellectuals and visionary giants like Mbeki and Mugabe, who belong to the Afrikan Greats the likes of Nkwame Nkruma?

    James Sibanda
    London

Leave a Reply

All comments to the site are moderated and will therefore not appear immediately on the site. Justice Africa reserves the right to edit comments, and will bar comments that do not use a reasonable tone; and that display unjustified and immoderate criticism or discrimination against itself or any third party.